If you're a fan of televised sports -- hell, if you own a TV set -- you owe it to yourself to note the passing of TV executive Roone Arledge, who died on Thursday. Arledge was a visionary who revolutionized the televising of sports, most notably by bringing it into weekday prime time, ushering in the era of sports as big business. He created "ABC's Wide World of Sports," as elementary to the American sporting lexicon as the tagline he coined: "the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat." He produced 10 Olympics, including some of the most controversial Olympic moments such as the fist-raising salute by athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos in 1968 and the disruption of the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich by Arab terrorists who took hostage and murdered 11 Israeli athletes.
But the creation he'll be most remembered for in the sporting world is "Monday Night Football." MNF brought sports into prime-time TV on a weekly basis and introduced innovations such as instant replays, slow motion and freeze frames, on-field mikes, hand-held cameras and sophisticated graphics, innovations which we now take for granted. But beyond his technical advances came the real story, which was Arledge's grasp on the power of providing the game -- any game -- with a narrative structure. From his
New York Times obituary, which runs an astounding five pages on the web:
One of the signature touches that Mr. Arledge brought to the programs he later produced he learned in these courses: the importance of narrative and the role of the hero. Years later, ABC announcers were taught to emphasize what Mr. Arledge called the ``story line'' of whatever game they were covering and to focus on a star whose personal story could transcend the outcome of the events itself. The ``up close and personal'' biography of an athlete, which ABC's Olympic coverage invented to introduce viewers to obscure foreign athletes, became the template for personalizing the stories of stars in every sport.
Another important facet of Arledge's legacy is infusing the role of the sports announcer with the expectation of journalistic integrity; under him, announcers were no longer subject to league approval and beholden to their control. That journalistic impulse became a foundation for his handling the Munich crisis, as ABC Sports oversaw 17 hours of coverage.
Arledge eventually went from being president of ABC Sports to being president of ABC News, where he made his mark with extensive late-night coverage of the Iran hostage crisis (creating the show "Nightline" in the process), and built up the network's news division into a powerhouse with shows such as "20/20" and "World News Tonight". In short, he was one of the major players of the late 20th century; Life magazine cited him as one of its 100 most important Americans of the 20th century in 1990.
Not that the developments he spearheaded have been entirely for good. In truth, many of them turned out to be Pandora's Boxes. His prime-time sports strategy "opened the door to the entire era of sports as big business," noted his protege Dick Ebersol. "All of the money the athletes are making, all the big money in sports, none of that would be happening if not for Roone,'' said Ebersol. As Arledge himself put it early on, "In short, we are going to add show business to sports!'' Those who rail at the loss of daytime World Series games or bemoan the presence 24-hour news and sports networks, who blanch at the astronomical salaries of athletes or stifle the urge to vomit during an up-close-and-personal profile, might be justified in aiming a certain amount of blame on Arledge's "innovations."
But that's not the point. Arledge didn't just revolutionize television, he televised a revolution in which the power of the medium became the real story. His ideas and innovations were often TOO powerful in the wrong hands, done to mind-numbing excess or filled with tabloid squalor by those with lower standards. That's not his fault. He was a man with the vision and integrity to do it the right way.
Remaking the Yankees for 2003, Part IV: Third Base
I've been focusing on pitching and money thus far in this series. But for this article, I thought I'd jump ahead to third base, since the reports are that the Yankees are close to a deal, and I wanted to get my two cents in first.
Last winter, the Yankees acquired Robin Ventura from the Mets to replace third baseman Scott Brosius, who retired rather than test free agency. At the time, the Yanks hoped that Ventura could provide a one-year stopgap and that prospect and former University of Michigan star quarterback Drew Henson would be ready to take over the hot corner for 2003.
Plagued by injuries, Ventura had suffered two consecutive down seasons as a Met in 2000 and 2001, struggling monumentally at times. But even during those lean years, his reliable strike-zone judgement, decent power and solid defense yielded a value far beyond his .230ish batting averages. A value, in fact, not dissimilar to that which Brosius provided
at his PEAK. Held against those already not-so-lofty standards, Ventura looked to be a good bet to improve with a change of scenery. Overexposed in the middle of the Mets' thin lineup, he was unable to provide the bulk of the power alongside Mike Piazza. But with the Yanks, Ventura would be further down in the order, behind guys who got on base AND provided power.
Ventura ended up being almost everything the Yankees could have dreamed. He got off to a hot start, racking up RBIs by the bushel and making the All-Star team for only the second time in his career. With 19 homers and 62 RBI at the break, he'd essentially equalled his power numbers for 2001 (21/61); in addition he was hitting .263 AVG/.367 OBP/.511 SLG/.867 OPS. He swooned a bit late in the season (only 8 HR and 31 RBI in the 2nd half), but made it through the season healthy, and hit impressively during the Yanks' brief playoff appearance. In addition, he was a class act all the way; Joe Torre and several of his teammates spoke of his positive effect in the clubhouse. His defense did appear shaky at times; he tied for the league lead in errors for third basemen, but other metrics, such as
Davenport's Fielding Runs placed him as being just slightly off his more recent Gold Glove seasons, and better than some of his early ones (more on that subject another time).
All in all, a not-too-shabby season. Had Henson progressed to the level forecasted, the Yankees' plan would have been perfect. But as has been
reported elsewhere at length, Henson struggled both during the regular season and in the Arizona Fall League. At AAA Columbus,
Henson hit .240/.301/.435, with 18 HR and 55 RBI. Distressingly, he struck out 151 times in 471 ABs, and he also made 35 errors in the field. In Arizona, after several articles touted his sub-Mendoza Line average, he finished at .211/.304/.401 with 6 HR, 23 RBI, and 11 errors in 41 games. Gulp. Henson, who will be 23 in February, will need at least another season in AAA; according to his AFL manager Tommy John, he's about a thousand at-bats behind where a ballplayer his age should be.
What's fortunate for the Yankees is that $9.8 million of Henson's $17 million contract isn't due until 2005-2006, by which time he will likely have gotten the picture that a lucrative NFL career is passing him by. He may well have reconsidered his options by then; my guess is at this time next year, we will all (Drew included) know enough to see whether he should return to the huddle.
Ventura made $8.25 million last year, and with the Yanks in cost-cutting mode this offseason, they made it immediately clear they wouldn't be offering up that kind of scratch. At the same time, they once again have a hole at third base with their phenom "a year away." Besides Ventura, who are their options? Here's a brief rundown from
ESPN's Top Fifty Free Agents list, with a few other names from the trade winds thrown in for good measure:
Age PA HR BI OBP SLG OPS EqA RARP
Alfonzo 29 557 16 56 .391 .459 .851 .307 42.9
Lowell 29 665 24 92 .346 .471 .816 .285 36.8
Ventura 35 553 27 93 .368 .458 .826 .295 36.7
JHernandez 33 581 24 73 .356 .478 .834 .285 35.3
Bell 30 615 20 73 .333 .429 .762 .273 26.2
Randa 33 604 11 80 .341 .426 .768 .268 20.0
Mueller 32 417 7 38 .350 .393 .743 .270 15.3
Zeile 37 568 18 87 .353 .425 .778 .257 12.6
Tatis 28 424 15 55 .303 .399 .702 .244 3.4
Most of these abbreviations you should know. Age is as of 7/1/2003 (July 1 is the conventional statistical cutoff for determining player age in a given season). EqA and RARP are from
Baseball Prospectus' methods of offense measurement; the former is like OPS boiled down to a batting average scale after adjusting for league offense levels and park effects (.260 is defined as average), while the latter is runs above a replacement-level third-baseman. I've ranked them according to RARP.
The non-free agents in this list are:
• Mike Lowell, once a Yankee prospect before being traded to the Florida Marlins. Signed for $3.7 million next season. Discussed by the Yanks early on, but the Marlins are apparently not looking to trade him.
• Joe Randa of the Kansas City Royals, signed for $4.5 million next season. The ballplayer closest to my exact date of birth, which means neither of us is ever going to see an eight-figure contract.
• Fernando Tatis of the Montreal Expos. Salary next season $6 million. Wallowing in Montreal for the past two seasons, Tatis has been discussed as ballast in various configurations of a Bartolo Colon trade.
• David Bell, formerly of the San Francisco Giants, not to mention the Seattle Mariners, Cleveland Indians and St. Louis Cardinals. Bell signed with the Philadelphia Phillies last week to the tune of 4 years/$17 million. The Yanks made some noise about him, so it's a relief to see another team suckered by a career year featuring a .333 OBP.
The other free agents come with their warnings as well:
• The Mets' Edgardo Alfonzo has had back problems, though in three of the past four seasons he's hit above .300 with an .850 OPS. At his best, he's the pick of the litter here, but he's missed over 70 games the past two seasons. He's also widely rumored to be older than his listed age. Alfonzo can play second base as well as third, which could intrigue the Yanks as an option for moving Alfonso Soriano to the outfield down the road. But 'Zo's been seeking a 4-year contract, and the Yanks haven't been willing to commit. At the very least, he'll make about $7-8 million next season via arbitration, which looks too rich for the Yanks' taste.
• Bill Mueller came off of knee surgery last season and didn't contribute much after being a late-season re-acquisition by the Giants. Might have a job there now that Bell has departed.
• Todd Zeile racked up his numbers in the rareified air of Colorado, something EqA sees right through. His best days are clearly behind him.
• Jose Hernandez isn't really a third baseman anymore; he made the NL All-Star team at shortstop last season, and
made headlines late in the year when Brewers manager Jerry Royster sat him to prevent him breaking the major league record for strikeouts in a season. The Yanks have never showed interest in him, but he would offer about the same production as Ventura at an even cheaper price. Not to mention the possibility of versatility down the road should they broach the subject of shifting Derek Jeter to another position. But it ain't gonna happen.
Ventura is certainly near the top of this list in terms of productivity. And in a convenient coincidence for the Yankees, he's apparently willing to come cheap; the word in the New York Times is that he's taking a physical preliminary to completing a $5 million deal. Ladies and gentlemen, it's not often that a player comes to a team, improves his performance and theirs, and is willing not only to take a 40% pay cut but to move out of the way when the time comes. It takes a class act to see the big picture on those terms: Robin Ventura, the consummate professional.
Once again, I find myself advocating what is hardly a radical move for the Yanks. But at a steep discount and with the flexibiltiy he provides their long-term picture, Ventura's signing is the closest thing to a no-brainer they'll get this offseason.
If you're a baseball stat freak like me, your world just became a little more complete this weekend: baseball-reference.com, the online encyclopedia of baseball statistics, has added stats for 2002 to its database. Wo-hoo! Player stats, team stats, league stats, postseasons, award winners, league leaders, career leaders, similarity scores, birthday finders and a million other things, all crosslinked every which way but
Luis in what may be the most perfectly conceived reference website mankind has ever seen.
The disclaimer I'm obliged to insert here is that I designed the site's banner, but
you knew that already. My praise for B-R is heartfelt. Because if it wasn't for its accessibility and ease of its use, I could have spent the last two years of my life doing something productive like watching more television or calculating my portfolio losses in Quicken. Instead I've clicked through page after page of stats, finding interesting things to write about and argue over. And if, hypothetically speaking, I've needed to tabulate how many pitchers on the
1978 Dodgers staff won more than 150 games in the big leagues during a quick coffee break, at least I've had the means to do so efficiently. Or would have, if the occasion had arisen, I mean. Cough, cough...
B-Ref is a user-supported website, and as such, it raises money to cover its by selling sponsorship to individual pages, which run from $5/year for the least visited to
$395/month for the busiest. I
sponsor several pages myself; it's a fun way for me to publicize this site and to "collect" the pages of some of my favorite players and personalities.
Since the new pages (2002 teams and rookies who debuted during the season) don't have an established traffic rate to set their price, the site's founder, Sean Forman, is
auctioning them off via eBay, starting at $10. What better Hanukkah or Christmas gift is there for a loved one than sponsoring
Esix Snead's or
Coco Crisp's page?
Of course, plenty of older players and teams are still without sponsors. For only pennies a day, you can feed the starving page of
Marvin Lane. And if anybody can get me out of this blog entry without making a Sally Struthers joke, I just might sponsor a page for you.
