Working the Room in a Winter Wonderland

What’s a blog-writing outsider like me doing at Major League Baseball’s Winter Meetings? That was a question I couldn’t adequately answer, not even after Alex Belth and I entered the lobby of the New Orleans Marriott and cut through a swarm of baseball executives, agents and writers in search of the Baseball Prospectus contingent who had encouraged us to come down. Traveling on my own dime, lacking media credentials and anonymous to all but a small handful of people in the room, I shook my head as I surveyed the spectacle. What had I gotten myself into?

The answer turned out to be four days of pure sensory overload, intensive immersion in a realm of the baseball world I had only previously imagined. I watched, talked, argued, networked, laughed, ate, drank, gambled and strolled through the human sewer of degradation that is Bourbon Street. But mostly I just listened to a wide variety of perspectives about the game and the weekend’s happenings. I cemented friendships with people who had previously been only names at other nodes of this electronic wonderland. The whole experience left me so giddy I was unable to fall asleep at night no matter how exhausted my body was.

Back in September, Alex and I had booked our trip at the encouragement of BP’s injury expert, Will Carroll. The creator of the juicy Under the Knife newsletter, Will’s own experience at last year’s Winter Meetings in Nashville resulted in his joining BP’s staff, and over the past year, he’s become both a supporter of our sites and a reliable, invaluable source of information. He felt that the two of us would benefit by meeting the rest of the BP delegation, gaining access to their network of contacts and getting a first-hand glimpse into the sausage factory of the baseball biz. As we found him in the Marriott lobby on Friday night, his welcoming smile and gregarious manner put us at ease. “You guys are here just in time! We have to get you caught up,” he laughed, before BP associate editor Ryan Wilkins delivered the joke’s punchline: “You’ve missed nothing.” With the exception of the arrivals, there had been little news beyond the Blue Jays’ signing of Miguel Batista… and wasn’t that Toronto GM J.P. Ricciardi standing a few feet away?

Will and Ryan introduced me to the rest of the BP contingent — columnists Joe Sheehan, Nate Silver and Dayn Perry, and intern Chaim Bloom — on the fringe of the elevated bar at the center of the lobby, and beers were procured. Slightly starstruck, I sussed out the scene, recognizing familiar faces from the game and trying to gauge their place within the context of the giant cocktail party we were crashing. Most obvious were the managers, looking slightly out of place sans caps: Dusty Baker, Lou Piniella, Tony Peña, Felipe Alou, Lee Mazzilli, Ozzie Guillen and Jack McKeon, who spent much of the evening outside, smoking his cigar like a man who’d won a World Series or something. Some of the execs stood out: slick Ricciardi (about whom Toronto Blue Jays second baseman famously commented, “He looks like he was a pimp back in the day”), suave Kenny Williams, stately Omar Minaya, towering Bill Bavasi, and petite Kim Ng, the female Dodger Assistant GM who fits exactly into the slot Joe Sheehan described as “Assistant GM height.” Also prevalent were national media types such as ESPN’s Jayson Stark and Jeff Brantley, though we couldn’t locate Peter Gammons. A few players such as Ron Gant roamed the floor, pressing the flesh in search of another opportunity to play ball, and recognizable former players such as Pete Vuckovich (special assistant to Pittsburgh GM Dave Littlefield) dotted the landscape as well.

But beyond those names, I needed guidance; working the room was a whole gaggle of baseball writers whose bylines may have been familiar to me, but whose faces were not. One exception was Rocky Mountain News columnist Tracy Ringolsby, whose black cowboy hat, mint-green western shirt, prominent gut, and oversized belt buckle (which I’m told reads “Tracy Ringolsby, Baseball Writer”) stand out like a sore thumb. Most of the writers had their credentials turned around or tucked into their pockets, so I turned to somebody and asked, “Why don’t these guys come with captions?”

Alex, who’s been making a name for himself via a series of interviews with writers for his Bronx Banter site, took initiative and began working the room himself. He sought out some of his subjects, such as Sports Illustrated‘s Tom Verducci and former New York Times Yankee beat writer Buster Olney (now at ESPN). He also talked to New York beat writers such as the Times‘ Jack Curry and the New York Post‘s Joel Sherman and Mark Hale. By the end of the weekend, he was chatting up Tony Perez and others as part of his research for a young adult book on Curt Flood.

As for myself, with a less bold demeanor and a more nebulous agenda, I began working up a comfort level with the BP guys. Ryan and I have been corresponding for almost two years; as an 18-year-old college student, he had created the Baseball Junkie blog and then sought guidance in expanding to a more full-fledged site, for which I designed the banner. Still in school at Saint Mary’s College in California, he now gathers The Week in Quotes for BP and does his share of editorial heavy lifting. Chicago-based Nate is the creator of the PECOTA forecasting system; I spent the weekend peppering him with questions along the lines of, “What does your system say about ____ _____?” Chaim is a senior at Yale with aspirations of working for a major-league team; he spent much of the weekend vying for interviews with various clubs. L.A.-area-based Joe was the senior member of BP on site; roughly the same age as I am, he’s clearly comfortable as a baseball insider, possessing an impressive rapport with writers and execs. Austin-based Dayn does consulting work for the San Diego Padres and covers baseball for Fox Sports in addition to his BP writing. And Will, creator of the med-head school of baseball analysis, does ESPN Radio for an Indianapolis station as well as his BP responsibilities. The son of a prominent orthopedic surgeon, Will’s hard-won expertise in sports medicine comes first-hand. He’s got the signatures of the game’s Picassos — scars from stars — on his own body: rotator cuff repaired by Dr. Frank Jobe, hip replaced by Dr. Robert Kerlan, knees done by Dr. James Andrews. The man’s been under so many knives that he’s a medical miracle himself.

We hung around the lobby for a little over an hour on Friday, watching the awkward social dance in our midst before deciding at 1 AM that our work for the night was done. We retreated to our hotel, the Riverfront Wyndham, a ten-minute walk from the Marriott, where Will, Ryan, Joe, Nate and I put together a poker game. Now, I’m familiar with so many cheesy three-, five-, and seven-card variants of poker that I’ve lost count, but the game of Texas Hold ‘Em which transpired was unlike any I’ve ever played. As I said before, Joe and Nate know their ways around the poker table and punctuated the baseball chatter with stories of various tournaments and betting strategies. Meanwhile I struggled to comprehend meaning for the terms button, blind, flop, turn, and river, and to grasp our game’s arcane (to me, at least) betting rules. For my trouble, I was down $15 in the first twenty minutes, but I went on a bluffing spree which got me back within hailing distance of even; from this rally came the exaggerated reports of my short-lived publishing empire — so little had happened in terms of baseball news that Joe promised to include the poker game in his next day’s writeup.

As we played, we flipped through late-night TV, at one point settling on a rodeo where every hat-wearing contestant became an excuse to shout, “Hey, it’s Tracy Ringolsby!” The best line of the night came from Will, the evening’s biggest patron: “You can’t bluff me, I’m not even paying attention!” My chips lasted until 3:30 and I ended the night down $25 — a pretty cheap poker lesson by the standards of my high-school days. Joe and Will vowed to stay up through their appearance on BP Radio at 7:00 AM, but I was having no part of that. Still, sleep didn’t exactly come easily in the midst of such excitement.

Back at the Marriott the next day, we gathered in the bar, waiting for deals to unfold, every now and then stretching our legs by taking laps around the lobby. It was during one such lap that I passed Peter Gammons, hobbling around in sneakers to go with his khakis and blue blazer and talking to Jayson Stark. I overheard the two of them conjecturing about the weekend’s potential blockbuster deal, the Alex Rodriguez-Manny Ramirez trade — around which a flurry of deals seemed to hinge — but I felt too conspicuous to actually stop and eavesdrop further. Eavesdropping is practically the national pastime at a place like this, just one of the bizarre social customs that would be frowned upon in other company. More strange conventions: telling a bystander to move over a few feet so that you can keep somebody in your line of sight, ready to pounce once a conversation ends, and lapsing into silence with the person you’re talking directly to as the two of you ogle other men chatting across the room. And aside from the bartenders, the aforementioned Ms. Ng, and a few female publicists, that’s all there are in the Marriott lobby, hundreds of men, most of them unsexy except for their job descriptions. You’d think Omar Minaya was wearing a thong bikini for all the attention he got.

Apart from the no-go on the A-Rod deal, the big buzz of Saturday was that the Yankee front office had been barred from the meetings by George Steinbrenner, the Boss’ typically tyrannical way of punishing the team’s on-the-field shortcomings and asserting who’s in charge. Truth be told, with several free-agent deals pending and the Yanks trying to protect their C-grade prospects on the 40-man, they lacked the roster space to do anything substantial. So our dreams of finding Yankee GM Brian Cashman passed out in a pool of his own vomit in some Bourbon Street gutter would remain — to use the term the BP guys taught me — “wishcasting.” Stark’s word that Roger Clemens was mulling a comeback with the Houston Astros following their signing of Andy Pettitte circled the room, far too overplayed a rumor for me to believe; if he’s going to decide, it’s not going to be in December, folks.

That’s the way the Winter Meetings work for a man in my position. You stand or sit around, talking baseball, waiting for some rumor to either be validated or dismissed by your network. “Whaddaya hear?” is the most common question asked, followed by “Have you heard?” It probably doesn’t sound like much, but when you’ve got the well-connected intelligence that I was suddenly privy to, each morsel of information generates excitement. Minutes after a rumor would reach us, somebody — most likely Joe or Will — would head off to pump one of his connections for further details and then return to the pack, shaking his head or nodding effusively. It scarcely mattered that the BP dispute with MLB over credentials (see: the Pete Rose brouhaha) left them frozen out of the media room; all the news that anybody cared about passed through the lobby on its way there. Badges? We don’t need no steenkin’ badges.

And when the biggest news was that the Phillies were considering Kent Mercker and the Royals about to sign Tony Graffanino, we were quite content to roll our eyes and keep talking baseball, comparing perspectives, recounting tales from our viewing experience, or making new friends. One of the more enjoyable parts of the weekend came on Sunday afternoon, when I sat around for over an hour discussing baseball books with Alex, Ryan, Nate, Geoff Silver, former Assistant Director fo Baseball Administration for the Cincinnati Reds, and Tim Marchman, reporter for the New York Sun and editor at Ivan R. Dee, which is publishing books by Will and Nate. My big contribution to the discussion was to hawk Seasons in Hell, Mike Shropshire’s hilariously gonzoid account of the mid-’70s Texas Rangers of Whitey Herzog and Billy Martin. Tim, who’s writing a book on Bud Selig and has been sniffing around current collusion allegations, gave a great thumbnail sketch of books devoted to the game’s labor history, most prominently Marvin Miller’s A Whole Different Ballgame, which his publisher is bringing back to print. Alex discussed some of his Curt Flood research, then started kicking around the topic of books about Latino ballplayers, particularly Cuban defectors. My reading list grew by the minute.

A couple of deals stand out as illustrating the way the meetings work. As we broke for a late lunch Saturday afternoon, Dayn told us that he’d heard that the Padres offer to centerfielder Mike Cameron — three years, $15.75 million — had been topped by the Oakland A’s. Later that evening, when Joe Sheehan hit us with that ill-advised second round of hurricanes at Pat O’Brien’s, Chaim got a call telling us that the A’s had lost out on Cameron to the New York Mets. Ryan, an A’s supporter, muttered in frustration as our group — showing the night’s final stand of rational thought when it came to baseball — tallied up the damage from the A’s losing out on both Cameron and reliever Keith Foulke. “A tough weekend for Billy Beane,” as someone remarked.

The Miguel Tejada deal was another lesson (and even worse news for Beane). Tejada’s name had popped up in several contexts during Friday and Saturday; word was that the Seattle Mariners had increased their offer, the Detroit Tigers were still trying to throw money at him, and whatever happened to his interest in the Anaheim Angels anyway? Sunday afternoon’s bombshell was that the Oakland shortstop had signed with the Baltimore Orioles for six years and $65 million. “Six, sixty-five,” we kept repeating over and over as if it were some sort of talisman. The discussion quickly turned to Oriole owner Peter Angelos’ willingness to spend money now that Albert Belle is off the payroll, and his apparent confidence that the O’s will be receiving a nine-figure settlement for allowing the Expos to move to Washington, D.C. Veddy interesting, we agreed, and then Alex and I left with former Big Easy resident Tim, bound for a stroll around the quieter parts of the French Quarter. When we returned, the buzz surrounding the O’s was even louder: not only were they getting Tejada, but also Vladimir Guerrero (who shares the same agent as Miggy) and Ivan Rodriguez. Neither of those two deals came to fruition by the weekend’s close, but the speculation that the Orioles were finally spending money again brought talk of the “AL Beast” division.

Back to the Cashman situation, another object lesson in the world of the Winter Meetings. Jack Curry’s Saturday piece in the Times had sounded the Mad King George alarm and set a subdued tone for every Yankee-related discussions I had all weekend:

One baseball official who has spoken to a few members of the Yankees’ hierarchy said the 73-year-old Steinbrenner had stopped seeking the opinions of Cashman; Oppenheimer; Mark Newman, a vice president; Gene Michael, the trusted evaluator who has been with the organization for more than three decades; and other club executives whose opinions normally help mold the Yankees.

The official said a Yankees official had told him that Steinbrenner had sometimes acted so single-handedly and haphazardly that, if he did listen to someone about pursuing a player, it was just as likely to be an accountant as a scout.

Michael said he had not been quizzed about signing the 35-year-old Gary Sheffield to a three-year contract, about signing Kenny Lofton to a two-year deal or about acquiring Kevin Brown from Los Angeles.

“If you ask me if they’ve contacted me about anything, I’ll say they haven’t,” Michael said. “That’s all I can say.”

On Sunday, Joel Sherman published another piece in the Post about the Yankee GM’s apparent dissatisfaction; “Fed-Up Cashman Tells Pals He’s Gone After Season,” as the headline blared. Sherman wrote:

Several of his industry friends say Cashman has told them he has had enough of Steinbrenner, and that when this season and his contract ends, he is going to leave the only organization for which he has worked. One NL executive summed up the sentiment by saying, “He’s done there.”

Steinbrenner barred Cashman or any Yankee official from attending these meetings, which is viewed as another slap at his GM. When reached yesterday at his Connecticut home, Cashman refused comment on his long-range plans…

Steinbrenner could always can Cashman before the end of the year. But a person who has spoken with Cashman said he is more worried that, out of spite, The Boss will pick up his 2005 option rather than fire him. Furious at one juncture during the postseason, Steinbrenner screamed at Cashman that he would not pick up the option and Cashman could go work for the Mets….

Friends say Cashman accepted a three-year, $3.3 million extension previously because his wife is from the area, and he did not want to uproot his family. But now, one of those friends says, “This is his last year in the circus. I wouldn’t even be surprised if he got out of baseball and went into another business. He’s tired of the screaming matches with George, not being listened to and just the general disrespect.”

Late on Sunday, Alex introduced me to Curry, and right around the time I was flattering him with the fact that my lil’ ol’ blog links to him often and pressing my business card into his hand, word came around that — guess what — Cashman’s option for 2005 had been picked up, and that at least one of the so-called friends of Cashman was a certain pallid, malnourished-looking guy wearing several World Series rings. Delicious.

Not all of the Yankee news was so positive. When word arrived that the Kenny Lofton deal was as good, I begged Dayn (whose Padres had at one point shown an interest) to recommend to GM Kevin Towers that Lofton be signed immediately. “I’d be derelict in my duty if I did that,” smiled Dayn. Damn. “Two years?” asked enraged Yankee fan Joe Sheehan, cracking his knuckles and narrowing his eyes. “When I’m home over Christmas, we’re gonna get together and take out George, Brooklyn-style.” I did feel pretty good — or at least somewhat validated — when Will told me that his sources had confirmed that the Yanks “failure” to sign Pettitte was indeed a medically-motivated decision.

Along with the Yanks, much of the weekend’s focus fell on the Red Sox. Their signing of Foulke seemed to indicated a return to the concept of a true closer, but even that news paled in comparison to the speculation about the A-Rod deal. No sooner would Will announce that his source had told him the deal was “dead, dead, dead, DEAD” than I’d be talking to somebody like Verducci and he’d say, “Oh, I’m hearing it’s still alive.” Curry confided that he had a new angle on the deal which nobody else had seen, but his published suggestion that Byung Hyun Kim would be a Texas-bound throw-in fell on deaf ears.

For all of the Sox talk, I never once did see Theo Epstein, or Billy Beane — the other poster-boy for the BP approach — for that matter. While they were briefly sighted by our crew, these most interesting characters stayed largely out of sight during the weekend, working deals out of their rooms upstairs rather than walking the Marriott floor. But for every power broker who kept a low profile, another one was sitting two tables away. I fell asleep Sunday night with the smell of Chicago White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf’s cigar permeating my clothes. Now that’s getting close to the action.

It was an amazing, exhilirating weekend, one I can barely do justice to in this space. So much happened that was “off the record,” (“Who knew Nate Silver had a plus arm?”) but there was even more which my supersaturated little mind just couldn’t absorb in the time we were there. Check out my boy Alex’s twin takes on the weekend’s proceedings — he captured the atmosphere of the lobby so well that I can’t even compete. Thanks to Alex for being my right-hand man throughout our travels, bearing the burden for my surgically repaired shoulder. Special thanks to the BP boyz as well for making me part of an unforgettable weekend; being introduced to so many great people as a “Friend of Prospectus” flatters me by association. And welcome to any of you reading this on the basis of having met me in N’awlins — I hope my amateur take has brought a new angle to something that seems like old hat, and that you’ll keep coming back for more.

Postcard From New Orleans

If you’re a baseball fan attuned to the Hot Stove League, you’ve probably wondered what happens at the annual Winter Meetings. This year, at the encouragement of Baseball Prospectus’ Will Carroll and Bronx Banter’s Alex Belth, I came down to New Orleans to get a firsthand look.

The trades and signings you can read about elsewhere, and I can’t really do justice to my end the story right now. It’s noon, there’s a hole where my stomach used to be, and Alex, living in another time zone in the same hotel room, has beaten me to the punch with a very good summary of the way things work here. But suffice it to say I’m having a great time. Through Will, I’ve met a handful of the Prospectus folks — Joe Sheehan, Nate Silver, Ryan Wilkins, Dayn Perry (who’s here in his capacity as a Padres consultant), Chaim Bloom, and Susan Graham — and this bunch has done their best to include me in their roving pack of statheads. These people are as friendly and witty as they are smart, and it’s a nice little boost to my ego to know that they like my work.

Sheehan’s column on the meeting’s first day included this little note towards the bottom:

It should be noted that for about an hour last night, Jay Jaffe owned Baseball Prospectus. I promise to never again be suckered by someone who pretends to need a reminder of how poker is played, or play with someone who comes equipped with a built-in nickname. Well, except “Baldy” Carroll.

Alas, “Futility Infielder Presents Baseball Prospectus” never had a chance to go live, as I frittered away my empire just as slowly as I’d built it. Joe’s a real shark when it comes to cards — the guy plays poker tournaments, and could probably be the frontman for Poker Prospectus — but it was Nate who took everybody’s cash on Friday night. Never mess with a guy who builds player projection databases as a hobby.

Last night, Will’s warning about the perils of drinking a second Hurricane were soon followed by Joe buying everybody that second round. Bastard. From there, the official record of the evening ends. I’ll fill in the in-between soon enough, but I do have one scoop to present, which can be summarized in the following headline:

“Saddam Hussein Captured; Steinbrenner Mulls Contract”

More later…

Remaking the Yankees for 2004, Part II: The Bullpen

The epic saga of the post-Jeff Nelson Yankee bullpen is one which I’ve been rehashing here for three seasons. By now, I could write an opera. Nelson’s departure after the 2000 World Series created a void — reliable righty setup reliever — that the three-time World Champions have struggled to fill ever since. They tried faking their way through it in 2001 (Todd Williams, Carlos Almanzar, Briah Boehringer, Jay Witasick?), and then, admitting their mistake, threw huge dollars at Steve Karsay (4 years, $22 million) for 2002. But after last winter’s shabby treatment of mainstay lefty Mike Stanton (fifteen minutes to accept a two-year, $4.6 million contract) and their willingness to set the similarly reliable Ramiro Mendoza free, the Yanks’ karmic chickens began coming home to roost. The fragile Karsay turned up lame in the spring of 2003, a victim of shoulder tendinitis, and Mariano Rivera began the year on the DL with a groin strain.

One of the Yanks’ major shortcomings over the Brian Cashman era has been a general ignorance of the secondary talent market. With the Yanks, every solution is an expensive one, a name brand player whose signing is carefully constructed to make a splash — a directive straight from the throne of mad King George. So the Yanks threw their Stanton money at Chris Hammond, rewarding him for his first good season in seven years. They traded Orlando Hernandez for Pricey Proven Reliever Antonio Osuna. So it was something of a surprise to find that in this case, the Yanks also had a backup plan. Juan Acevedo, fresh off a 28-save, 2.65 ERA season as the Detroit Tigers closer, had been signed to a minor-league deal worth just under $1 million. With Rivera on the DL, the Acevedo signing looked brilliant. That would change soon enough.

I’ll spare you the further stomach-turning drama of the Yanks’ 2003 pen. The people who arrived over the winter fell out of favor, and some of them were replaced by more people who fell out of favor even more quickly. Finally some more people arrived, and the Yanks took them to the playoffs. The bodies of Acevedo, Osuna, Jason Anderson, Randy Choate, Al Reyes, Dan Miceli, Jesse Orosco, and Armando Benitez were strewn along the highway, while not-particularly-better bodies of Felix Heredia, Gabe White, and a not-as-good ol’ Jeff Nelson went to the postseason. Those of us watching considered taking turns gouging each other’s eyes out, as it was considerably less painful than what transpired when the bullpen door swung open.

In all, exactly three relievers topped 50 innings while wearing the pinstripes: Rivera, Hammond, and Osuna. Sterling Hitchcock, who spent the first half of the season auditioning as some fringe contender’s stopgap rotation solution, just missed with 49.2 innings. From the rest of the bunch, only Acevedo topped 25 innings, and the aforementioned trio of Heredia, White and Nelson totalled only 45 innings. Since such small sample sizes don’t yield fruitful evaluations, I’ll examine the full season stats of these pitchers, dispensing with the bystanders, innocent or not (conveniently, many of these are free agents and will be dealt with accordingly). I’ll use most of the same stats I did with starters, including DIPS ERA (dERA), but ignore the Won-Loss records. I’ll also include Adjusted Runs Prevented (ARP), a useful metric from Baseball Prospectus which I’ll explain below. Here’s how the 2003 Yankee relievers performed:

Player        IP    ERA   ARP   K/9    WHIP   K/W    HR/9   BABIP  dERA

M Rivera 70.7 1.66 18.1 8.02 1.00 6.30 0.38 .294 2.57
C Hammond* 63.0 2.86 9.9 6.43 1.21 4.09 0.71 .302 3.49
A Osuna 50.7 3.73 -0.6 8.35 1.54 2.35 0.53 .344 3.29

S Hitchcock *88.0 4.72 -2.1 6.98 1.40 2.13 1.44 .287 4.71
F Heredia* 87.0 2.69 12.4 4.66 1.23 1.36 1.03 .233 4.61
J Nelson 55.3 3.74 -8.4 11.06 1.36 2.83 0.65 .336 3.30
G White* 46.7 4.05 4.0 5.59 1.11 3.63 1.35 .257 4.14
J Acevedo 38.3 6.57 -10.9 6.57 1.83 1.56 1.41 .343 4.72

Because relievers often come and go with runners on base, traditional ERAs tend to over- or understate their performance based on that of their neighbors — similar to a hitter having more or fewer RBI based on who he’s batting behind. ARP uses a run expectancy matrix to give a more accurate measure of a pitcher’s responsibility; a positive number means a reliever did a good job at cleaning up other people’s messes, a negative number means you may want his fingerprints on file in case of arson. I like the stat a lot because it adds some shading to actual ERAs; for example, Jeff Nelson was at -8.4, making his 3.74 ERA all the less impressive, while Chris Hammond was at 9.9, a pretty decent number to go along with his 2.86 ERA. But since high or low BABIP rates are reflected in ARP as well as in actual ERA, I’m going to exclude it from my larger analysis below.

As a whole, the Yankee bullpen had the same ERA as the starters (4.02). Mariano Rivera was, of course, the class of the bullpen, striking out batters, showing amazing control, and keeping the ball in the park. When healthy, he’s still as good as it gets. Hammond didn’t repeat his amazing 0.95 ERA/1 HR season, but he showed excellent control and pitched pretty well; unfortunately, he lost Torre’s trust and sat idle in October while Jeff Weaver yielded a World Series-turning gopher ball. Osuna got little help from the Yankee defense and walked a lot of batters, but was otherwise pretty decent. He too lost Torre’s trust late in the season and didn’t make any of the October rosters. Hitchcock won his prized spot with the Cardinals about eleven minutes before they fell out of the NL Central race. Heredia and White were especially helped by their defenses (in Cincinnati as well as New York), which enabled them to get by without striking out a lot of batters; Heredia’s control was nothing special, but White’s was pretty good. Nelson fooled a lot of batters with his wicked slider, but he was particularly bad in handling other people’s problems, and had control problems once coming over from Seattle. Acevedo pitched like a guy auditioning to man the boiler room of Hell.

Rivera and Hammond are both signed for 2004, while everybody else above is a free agent. This leaves the Yankees with an opportunity to overhaul the pen — characteristically, in expensive fashion. As I write this, the Yanks have already made their moves, but I’ll nevertheless examine them in the context of the free-agent class, shown here with their innings rounded to the nearest whole:



Player IP ERA K/9 WHIP K/W HR/9 BABIP dERA
L Hawkins 77 1.86 8.73 1.09 5.00 0.47 .302 2.57 signed CHI
T Gordon 74 3.16 11.07 1.19 2.94 0.49 .294 2.69 signed NYY
T Adams 68 2.65 6.75 1.34 2.22 0.13 .324 2.95
J Nelson 55 3.74 11.06 1.36 2.83 0.65 .336 3.01
P Quantrill 77 1.75 5.12 0.98 2.93 0.23 .260 3.07 signed NYY
D Plesac* 33 2.70 9.99 1.20 3.36 0.81 .292 3.18 retired
A Osuna 51 3.73 8.35 1.54 2.35 0.53 .344 3.29
E Guardado* 65 2.89 8.27 0.98 4.29 0.96 .240 3.30 signed SEA
T Worrell 78 2.87 7.47 1.30 2.32 0.57 .291 3.33 signed PHI
D Holmes 42 4.29 9.86 1.38 4.18 1.07 .356 3.33
A Rhodes* 54 4.17 8.00 1.31 2.67 0.67 .312 3.36
K Foulke 87 2.08 9.14 0.89 4.40 1.04 .221 3.40
J Tavarez 84 3.66 4.20 1.22 1.44 0.11 .266 3.45
C Leskanic 53 2.22 8.54 1.27 1.72 0.34 .267 3.50 signed KC
U Urbina 77 2.81 9.12 1.13 2.52 0.94 .241 3.64
D Veres 33 4.68 7.16 1.26 5.20 1.10 .320 3.68
G Lloyd* 48 5.29 4.72 1.72 1.79 0.38 .365 3.68
M Timlin 84 3.55 6.99 1.03 7.22 1.18 .263 3.70 signed BOS
R Beck 35 1.78 8.15 1.02 2.91 1.02 .228 3.77 signed SD
T Martin* 51 3.53 9.00 1.18 2.13 1.06 .236 3.82 signed LA
S Hasegawa 73 1.48 3.95 1.10 1.78 0.62 .250 3.93 signed SEA
C Fox 43 3.12 9.55 1.52 1.48 0.62 .274 3.98 signed FLA
J Grimsley 75 5.16 6.96 1.65 1.61 0.72 .340 4.08 signed KC
K Ligtenberg 59 3.34 7.13 1.25 3.36 1.37 .291 4.09 signed TOR
S Sullivan 64 3.66 7.88 1.25 1.75 0.84 .239 4.11 signed KC
G White* 47 4.05 5.59 1.11 3.63 1.35 .257 4.14
A Alfonseca 66 5.83 6.92 1.55 1.89 0.95 .330 4.15
D Burba 43 3.53 7.27 1.41 1.84 1.04 .285 4.30
C Eldred 67 3.74 8.96 1.38 2.16 1.20 .291 4.33 signed STL
K Mercker* 55 1.95 7.81 1.41 1.50 0.98 .256 4.35
T Jones 69 7.08 7.73 1.81 1.90 1.31 .369 4.40
R Rincon* 55 3.25 6.51 1.39 1.25 0.65 .253 4.46
T Van Poppel 48 5.59 6.33 1.37 2.27 1.49 .281 4.49 signed CIN
M DeJean 83 4.68 7.73 1.51 1.82 1.42 .304 4.51
S Sparks 107 4.88 4.54 1.41 1.46 1.09 .286 4.60
F Heredia* 87 2.69 4.66 1.23 1.36 1.03 .233 4.61 signed NYY
R White 67 5.78 7.25 1.42 2.57 1.75 .303 4.64
J Acevedo 38 6.57 6.57 1.83 1.56 1.41 .343 4.72 signed PIT-m
D Miceli 70 3.20 7.42 1.19 2.32 1.66 .235 4.75 signed HOU
S Kline* 64 3.82 4.38 1.35 1.03 0.71 .249 4.80 signed STL
J Orosco* 34 7.68 7.68 1.82 1.38 1.06 .339 4.80 signed ARI
H Carrasco 38 4.93 6.34 1.57 1.35 1.17 .292 4.84
M Williams 63 6.14 5.57 1.70 0.95 0.71 .290 4.86
D Hermanson 69 4.06 5.11 1.37 1.63 1.18 .282 4.89 signed SF
S Reed 63 3.27 5.54 1.34 1.50 1.28 .267 5.04 signed COL
T Wendell 64 3.38 3.80 1.28 0.96 0.84 .233 5.06
J Wright 56 7.35 7.99 1.90 1.61 1.44 .381 5.07 signed ATL
J Franco* 34 2.62 4.19 1.40 1.23 1.31 .265 5.38
M Myers* 36 5.70 5.20 1.62 1.00 0.99 .281 5.40
M Guthrie* 43 2.74 5.06 1.45 1.09 1.27 .258 5.42
A Levine 71 2.79 3.80 1.35 1.03 1.14 .250 5.45
R Hernandez 60 4.35 6.75 1.73 1.05 1.50 .282 5.73
T Mulh'nd* 99 4.91 3.82 1.56 1.14 1.55 .292 5.87
J Fassero* 79 5.68 6.37 1.64 1.62 1.97 .309 5.87
Average 61 3.87 6.82 1.36 1.93 0.99 .285 4.30

Before we get too heavily into the discussion here, I’ll again remind that many of these pitchers don’t have a whole lot of innings to go on. One thing Voros McCracken showed was that even at low numbers of batters faced, DIPS ERAs correlate better with the following season’s ERAs than the actual ERAs do. The reason for this isn’t magic; the defense-independent stat line is built by regressing a pitcher’s rate stats towards the league averages, which is where this group will head. If I had more time, I’d consider these pitchers’ stats over the last two seasons, but since things have already shaken down quite a bit, I’m going to have to let that one go.

Anyway, the Yanks have done pretty well along these lines, signing the #2 and #5 pitchers on the board in Tom “Flash” Gordon and Paul Quantrill. The 36-year-old Gordon, who got a 2-year/$7.25 million deal, has the high K-rate, good control, and low homer tendencies that make DIPS salivate (he was the top-rated righty in my 2002 free-agent reliever analysis). His experience as a closer gives the Yanks a fallback if Mariano Rivera needs some rest. He’s got a reputation for fragility — Tommy John surgery in 1999, a torn shoulder muscle in 2002 — but was healthy in 2003, the first time since 1998 that he topped 50 innings. It’s still mindblowing to think that this guy won 17 games as a starter for the Royals back in 1989, on a team that included George Brett, Frank White, Willie Wilson, Bob Boone, and Bo Jackson. A bit pricey, but not a bad signing by the Yanks.

The 35-year-old Quantrill, who the Yanks got for 2 years/$6.8 mil, is coming off an outstanding season for the Dodgers. He’s been a good reliever for a long time, with a career 126 ERA+ (in other words 26% better than league average). And he’s durable, averaging 85 games a year for the past three seasons and 75 over the past seven; his 89 games last season are tied for 8th on the all-time list, and he’s got three of the top 17 spots up there. His strikeout rate is nothing special, but his control is good and he gives up very few homers (only 3 in the past two seasons). This guy is a rock, and though pricey, he’s another smart signing.

Heredia, 28, turned down an option of $1.7 million to sign a 2-year, $3.8 million deal with the Yanks. As I said above, he was helped a lot by his defense, with that .233 BABIP, something that might be of concern with the Yanks’ middle infield woes. But what’s strange is the way Heredia’s statistical pattern has evolved. From 1997-99, his K rate was above 8.0, and it was above 7.0 in 2000 and 2001. In those years he was basically a flyball pitcher, with grounder/flyball ratios just under 1.0. But his K rate has dropped to below 5.0, and he’s become a groundball-dependent pitcher (1.56 G/F ratio). His number of pitches per batter has fallen as well, from about 3.8-4.0 in the high-K years to 3.44 last season. All of this would tend to indicate a conscious choice in preserving his arm and trusting his stuff, and it seems to be working; his ERAs in 2002 and 2003 have been the lowest of his career by far. If he can improve his control while continuing this groundball evolution, he might be the Ramiro Mendoza Liner the Yanks need out of the pen.

The Yanks are rumored to be close to re-signing White, a 32-year-old lefty flyball pitcher. As I said above, his control is good. But his strikeout rates have fallen without the clear pattern that Heredia exhibits; his pitches per batter and G/F ratios have remained pretty stable. A bit above average, especially with the Death Valley of Yankee Stadium’s left centerfield, but really nothing special.

Jeff Nelson looks very good in the above analysis, thanks mostly to that awesome strikeout rate. Under normal circumstances, it wouldn’t have been a surprise to see the team re-sign him. But in addition to his maddening late-season inability to get ahead of hitters, and despite all of his past glory in the Bronx, Nelson’s a guy whose welcome has worn thin ’round these parts. Over the course of the season, he creates more than his share of headaches, even if they pale next to those of a David Wells. Credit the Yanks for moving on rather than being fooled by his jewelry. Still, somebody out there will get a pretty good reliever.

With Rivera, Karsay, Hammond, Gordon, Quantrill, Heredia, and presumably White, the Yanks will not only have the most expensive bullpen in the history of Western civilization, they have too many pitchers. White’s signing would presumably come at the expense of Hammond, whose squawking about New York’s tough crowds probably did more for his late-season disappearance than his pitching; he allowed only two runs in 21.1 innings in August/September, yet pitched only two innings in October. Grrrr… Hamond’s a better pitcher than White, and the only way this truly makes sense is for the meager dollars it will save (my guess is White will approach but not top $2 mil). That’s hardly worth the bother on a $200 million payroll.

Time prevents me from making more of this stuff right now (am I writing like I’ve got a plane to catch? very well, then, I have a plane to catch). Looking around, it’s surprising to see that Proven Closer Eddie Guardado got more money than former teammate Latroy Hawkins, the top-rated reliever here. Guardado looked good thanks to a low BABIP rate (.240) while Hawkins was lights-out even with a .302 BABIP. The Hawkins signing (3 years, $11 mil) — along that of Shigeosi Hasegawa and those made by the Yanks — helps to demonstrate that though the overall market for player salaries seems to be depressed, the top-flight middle relievers are still getting paid. Their relatively low salaries ($3-4 million per year) don’t compare to those of position players or closers, so mistakes aren’t as costly, and if the shit hits the fan there’s always a cheap replacment out there somewhere.

Getting Brown and Leaving Town

As you might expect, the New York papers are abuzz with Thursday’s Yankee activity — both the loss of Andy Pettitte and the tentative deal of Dodger ace Kevin Brown for Jeff Weaver and two prospects. Everybody and their paperboy is weighing in; New York Daily News alone has a dozen links to the story. If you want to know what Pettitte’s wife or Red Sox Nation is supposedly thinking, start there. For a more thorough rundown of the dailies, check out the monster job Alex Belth has done compiling links.

In the end, Pettitte’s decision clearly wasn’t about money, or the treatment he received from the Yankees, it was about wanting to pitch at home. You can point fingers at the way Steinbrenner or Cashman bungled this decision, but the New York Yankees shouldn’t have to hard-sell one of their own. Their message is clear: you wear the pinstripes, you have a chance to compete for a World Championship every year, end of story. Pettitte, aided by the Yanks’ willingness to give him the space to explore his options, chose Door #2.

Rob Neyer ran a neat little chart in his column yesterday showing that the two starters the Yanks have lost were outperformed by their two replacements (assuming the Brown deal goes through). Here it is:

         Innings  ERA+

Clemens 212 112
Pettitte 208 109
Brown 211 169
Vazquez 231 153

Add it up and you’ve got 420 innings at a 111 ERA+ (that’s a park-adjusted ERA of 11 percent better than league average) leaving town and 432 innings at a 164 ERA+ arriving. But that doesn’t tell the whole story; if we include Jeff Weaver in the equation (159 innings, 73 ERA+) that comes out to 579 innings at a 97 ERA+; in other words, a few hairs below league average. To mathematically balance that equation would take a pitcher that allowed just over a run per inning over about 150 innnings. So suffice it to say that pitching-wise, the Yanks come out well ahead in all of this, but that doesn’t begin to account for the loss of Nick Johnson in the Vazquez trade. When we try to figure that out, however, the simple algebra moves to a more complicated calculus. But until the Yanks are done making moves, it’s premature to point to a single decision and say “See! That’s where they blew it!”

I’ve been unable to find out which prospects the Yanks are including in the Brown deal. The one to rail at the gods about would be Dioner Navarro, a 19- year-old switch-hitting catcher who split his season, hitting .341/.388/.471 in Double-A Trenton and .299/.364/.467 in high-A Tampa. That’s about all the Yanks have left in terms of blue-chip prospects [Update: Baseball America reports that the two are righty pitchers Yhency Brazoban and Brandon Weeden. Brazoban (what a name!) is a converted outfielder who reached Trenton last year; Weeden finished 2003 in short-A Staten Island. Not much to get worked up about unless you’re related to one of them].

Anyway, I’m still hacking away at the DIPS reliever stuff before I head off to New Orleans tonight — Mr. Belth and I are going to take in the Winter Meetings from a bird’s-eye perspective. Mostly that will mean bending elbows with other writers, but who knows what we’ll see and hear?

Coming Unraveled

The news this morning is not good for Yankee fans. According to ESPN, the Houston Astros have called a noontime press conference to announce the signing of pitcher Andy Pettitte to three-year deal believed to be worth $32-$34 million. The Yanks, who had said signing Pettitte this offseason was their top priority, had a funny way of showing it for a pitcher who’s spent nine years and won 149 regular season and 13 postseason games. Their slow-moving approach, ostensibly to allow Pettitte to explore the market for his services before they made their final offer, did nothing but alienate the otherwise low-maintenance Pettitte.

But Dandy Andy had been talking the talk that he wanted to pitch closer to his Deer Park, Texas home, and with the Texas Rangers hamstrung by the need to cut payroll around Alex Rodriguez, the Astros emerged as soft-selling suitors for his services. The Yankee cash cavalry no doubt expected to ride to the rescue with a big deal that would keep Pettitte in pinstripes, but their three-year, $39 million offer, though it’s substantially more money, was too little too late.

I’m angry right now, more at the Yankee brass and George Steinbrenner than at Petttitte himself. In losing Pettitte, the Yanks give up the sole reliable southpaw in their rotation; David Wells has agreed to a minor-league deal, but he’s coming off of his second back surgery in three years and must be considered a question mark, especially in the temperament department. Pettitte’s numbers, his stellar performance this past October, and his history with the franchise should have merited red-carpet treatment, but instead the Yanks are left with a Texas-sized void in their rotation.

But it’s tough to begrudge Pettitte. In his nine years, he’s done it all, been to the playoffs every single season, reached six World Series and won four rings. He’s never taken to New York the way a David Cone has; one article last week said that in his nine years, Pettitte had only been into Manhattan a few times. He’s seen his best friend on the Yanks (Roger Clemens) retire, his closest ally (pitching coach Mel Stottlemyre) mistreated, and his manager seems poised to wrap up his business in the Bronx after this season. He can probably sense that the Yanks’ evolution into an older ballclub is not for the best. He’s earned the right to find a more comfortable spot for himself, and I can only wish him the best and thank him for the memories, particularly his three Game Two postseason wins this past October, when he looked every bit the icewater-peeing ace pitcher the Yanks needed.

The only thing I can say in defense of the Yankees is that they have a far better idea of the condition of Pettitte’s elbow than I do. Jack Curry’s New York Times article today notes that Pettitte “has pitched through elbow pain for years.” He missed about a third of the 2002 season with elbow tendinitis, and Will Carroll thinks he may never have been pitching at 100 percent. Notes Carroll in his Free Agent Health Report:

[H]e has some rather serious health questions. His elbow has come up tender several times, including this season, and his high-effort motion has always made pitching gurus a bit nervous. Pettitte seems to recover well with some down time and some renewed attention to his mechanics, but without knowing what the MRIs have shown, we can only guess that there’s some damage inside the arm. While Houston will certainly bid, New York wants to keep Pettitte in pinstripes. Given the risk of injury down the road, the shorter the deal the better. Seeing the 1974 version of Tommy John at #3 in his PECOTA comparables is enough to send me screaming like Jessica Biel in Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

I wrote last week that the longer the Yankees hold onto him, the greater the chance that someday he’ll be rehabbing on their watch, and for better or worse, that won’t be a problem anymore.

With this news, the Kevin Brown-for-Jeff Weaver rumors have reignited. I’m not sure what the Yanks still have that they can include with the deal besides the ability to free up payroll for the Dodgers. But George Steinbrenner and company have a whole omelette on their face right now, so I expect them to do something. Unfortunately, I fear that something will only make the Yanks into an older, creakier version of the ballclub I’ve been watching for the past several years.

Speaking of unraveling, the Yanks’ deal with Gary Sheffield is anything but done. Papers the past couple of days have been full of stories about Sheffield reneging on his handshake deal with Steinbrenner to ask for more money. Apart from the fact that the Yanks have been down this two-way street before (see Wells, David) and that Sheffield is one of the game’s biggest assholes along with one of its best hitters, this no-deal has led Brian Cashman to explore the possibility of signing Vladimir Guerrero. It’s a tantalizing possiblity. Vlad over Gary would be a lovely “fuck you” to a player who richly deserves it, especially since he seems to have no other suitors, a major boost to add a top-flight hitter in his prime, and a defensive upgrade as well. It’s also about the only thing that can put a happy face on this situation. There aren’t five hitters I’d rather see swing the bat than Gary Sheffield, but there aren’t five ballplayers I’d less rather root for (in order: Manny Ramirez, Pedro Martinez, Curt Schilling, Juan Gonzalez, and… Kenny Rogers? I’ll get back to you on that one).

I’d delve into more of this, but I’m working on my DIPS bullpen piece and plan to have it up by the end of the day.

Connection Down… Grrrrr

My Internet connection has been down for the past 24 hours, preventing me from doing any blogging here. Oh well, it does provide an excuse for me to get along with my DIPS evaluation of relievers, which hopefully I can finish before I head to New Orleans this weekend for baseball’s Winter Meetings. Don’t bet the house on it, though.

If you’re hungry for reading material check out Mike C.’s rant about this this year’s Hall of Fame ballot and read his interview with Rich Lederer, or Alex Belth’s interview with Sports Illustrated’s Tom Verducci, or Rob Neyer’s take on the Milwaukee Brewers mess and the news that they will open their books to auditors. I’d love to delve into these topics and several other nuggets of hot stove-related news, but the gods of technology don’t seem to be favoring me right now. Hopefully that will change later today, but if it doesn’t, listen to the wind and you’ll hear my anguished cries…

The Big Deal

No sooner had I put the finishing touches on yesterday’s piece than I got a phone call from my pal Nick. He sounded so somber as he asked, “Did you hear the news?” that I was bracing myself to learn of some tragic death. In that context, the Javier Vazquez/Nick Johnson deal was a relief from such gravitas. It wasn’t much of a shock, either; the Yanks’ determination to trade their young first baseman/DH had become a foregone conclusion, and the local newspapers had been buzzing about the imminence of the deal.

As I wrote yesterday, I have mixed emotions about the trade, which sent Johnson, outfielder Juan Rivera, and reliever Randy Choate to the Expos for Vazquez, a 27-year-old righty who’s a potential ace. I hate to see the Yanks trade Johnson, who posted a .422 OBP in 2003 and is already a heck of of a hitter. He was one of the few young, cheap players left in an aging, expensive lineup, and the best homegrown prospect they had to show for themselves since the bumper crop of ’95-’96 that helped fuel their championship run (Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada, Andy Pettitte, Mariano Rivera, Ramiro Mendoza). With Jason Giambi’s knee deteriorating, Johnson provided ample insurance at first base, not to mention the hope that he could develop into a Giambi-esque hitter.

But if they were going to trade him, sending Johnson far afield is a better thing than trading him to an AL rival (not that they considered that), and Lord knows, the Expos could use a break. Acquiring Johnson and freeing themselves from the potential of Vazquez’s contract keeps a glimmer of hope open that the ‘Spos can re-sign Vladimir Guerrero within their absurd MLB-imposed budgetary constraints. And while I think Johnson’s got a ton of potential, he’s not without his drawbacks. At 25, he’d shown an alarming fragility and a tendency to sustain hand and wrist injuries. A fractured hand cost him 61 games in 2003, he missed three weeks with a bruised wrist in 2002, and he spent all of 2000 on the DL with a mysterious wrist injury that was never fully explained. He’s also a bad-body type, seemingly destined to carry his baby fat until it becomes a bit less charming. His defense is average but unspectacular.

My friend Nick, who has a vested interest in watching Johnson develop into the best ballplayer bearing their shared first name, likes to speculate that Nick the Stick could develop power as Giambi has over the course of his career. For fun I did a quick comparison of the two by age (as of July 1 for each year). For purposes here, plate appearances (PA) is just at bats plus bases on balls because peripheral stats aren’t uniformly available via the web (here’s Giambi and here’s Johnson):

Johnson                               Giambi

Age Level PA 2B HR OBP SLG Age Level PA 2B HR OBP SLG
19 A 371 14 17 .466 .538 19 coll. ?? ?? ?? ??? ???
20 AA 543 33 14 .525 .548 20 coll. ?? ?? ?? ??? ???
21 DNP -- injured -- 21 A- 50 3 3 .440 .610
22 AAA 440 20 18 .407 .462 22 A 386 16 12 .430 .470
MLB 74 2 2 .308 .313
23 MLB 426 15 15 .347 .402 23 AA 220 9 6 .319 .363
AAA 201 20 4 .388 .500
24 MLB 394 19 14 .422 .472 24 AAA 224 26 3 .441 .537
MLB 204 7 6 .364 .398
25 MLB ??? 25 MLB 587 40 20 .355 .481
26 MLB ??? 26 MLB 574 41 20 .362 .495

What does that show? Not a hell of a lot. Johnson is ahead of Giambi’s pace at developing into a major-leaguer because he’s been playing in the minors since age 17 (which I didn’t include), while Giambi wasn’t drafted until after two years of college at Long Beach State and a stint on the ’92 US Olympic team. But Giambi was hitting a lot more doubles and had higher raw slugging percentages despite the difference in levels, and he’s showed a lot more durability since entering the majors. Until Johnson can put up a full season that’s comparable to Giambi’s ’96-’97 seasons (ages 25 and 26 above), I’m not sure I’m buying the comp, and I do think the physical differences between the two are considerable.

Beyond Johnson, I don’t think Juan Rivera will amount to much that can’t be easily replaced. He showed a bit more promise in the 185 major league plate appearances he got in 2003 (304 OBP/.468 SLG) than in the 91 he got in 2002 (.311/.361), but he lacks plate discipline and he’ll be 26 in April (five months older than Johnson). On the trade market, he had shown that he wasn’t valuable enough to command anything in return that could help the Yanks at the major league level. Choate should have been a serviceable lefty out of the Yankee pen , but Joe Torre never took to him and the Yankee org had yo-yoed him between AAA and the majors so often over the past four seasons it had to drive the poor guy nuts.

And say this for the Yankees (again): they’re getting the best pitcher on the market, a guy who’s better than any of the free agents available, and who’s still pretty young at 27. He’s got the things you like to see in a pitcher: a high K rate (9.4 per 9 IP) and excellent control (4.2 K/W ratio). He’s not ground-ball dependent (a plus with the shaky Yankee D), not gopher-happy. Except for the lack of postseason/pennant race experience, you couldn’t engineer a better fit for the Yanks right now.

The concern is his usage. He was second only to Kerry Wood in Pitcher Abuse Points this season. I spoke to Will Carroll about him last night and he says that Vazquez is a guy who doesn’t have a great build for a pitcher and that he tends to develop minor injuries (such as a calf strain or a blister) or fatigue and requires occasional extra rest, but that the good news is that he responds well. Will writes today that Vazquez is a “bright yellow light,” which is a bit alarming, but adds that the Yanks know how to deal with fragile pitchers. Furthermore:

Over the last four seasons, he has been able to pitch over 200 innings with effectiveness. Given he started that streak at age 22, one could look at Vazquez’s history as a ticking time bomb or as proof that we have a new member of the Abuse Sponge Club (Livan Hernandez, Proprietor). Vazquez is also the poster child for V-Loss. After any long rest, his velocity and movement on his fastball recover quickly, pointing to fatigue, not injury, as the culprit in his occasional lapses.

As Will notes, the Yanks won’t push him as hard as the Expos did. While Vazquez threw 231 innings for the Expos, no Yankee starter threw more than Mussina’s 215 — roughly an inning less for every two starts. The Yanks have more incentive to protect such a valuable commodity — both for the postseason and for a longer-term deal, should they choose to pursue one. And since the deal wasn’t contingent on the two parties agreeng to an extension, the Yanks have a chance to wait and see what develops. The trade will look like a disaster if Vazquez comes up lame in 2004, but it will look even worse if they sign him to a $40 million deal and he develops rotator cuff or elbow trouble a year down the road.

The nut of the deal is this: the Yankees gave up a fragile hitter (Carroll: “it speaks volumes that ‘prospect’ is still often the word used to describe him. The second-most used is ‘injured.'”) of questionable defensive value but great potential for a pitcher who’s just jelling into one of the top hurlers in the game. Given the Yankees rapidly aging core, dearth of young bargaining chips, and potential for taking on a lousy bat in centerfield (Kenny Lofton?) to replace him (with Bernie Williams slotting to DH), that’s a bit troublesome, but it’s a deal whose principle is sound: it’s much easier to find a good-hitting first baseman than it is to find a near-ace pitcher. “Youneverknow” what could happen with regards to injuries to either key player in this deal, but I think it’s a defensible move.

• • •

Yesterday’s DIPS/rotation piece got a great reception; it was a Clutch Hit on Baseball Primer and brought about 1000 people to the site, a week’s worth of traffic in a day, and enough praise to make my head swell a litte.

I want to point out a few things. This is the third batch of data that has been analyzed using DIPS 2.0, and the old war-horse is showing its cracks. There’s data that suggests that groundball pitchers have more control over the outcome of balls in play than flyball pitchers, and things like that which I’ll be covering this in more detail when I do my full-scale rollout later this month. Nevertheless, DIPS remains a handy way to quickly evaluate pitchers and quantify the things they do which show up as repeatable skills. I didn’t invent the system; I’m standing on the shoulders of the giant — Voros McCracken — who did, and have gleaned a lot from the people who’ve taken the time to kick the tires in the various stathead-related forums online. I’m doing my part to keep the stuff in the public eye, but I’ll be just as happy when somebody else comes along with an improved version of this fine tool.

I got some very good feedback on the piece from one of those tire-kickers, MGL (Mitchel Lichtman), who has done some impressive work on Baseball Primer and elsewhere, including the defensive metric Ultimate Zone Rating (which came up a few days ago).

MGL chided me for including Won-Loss records, which — given the broader audience I envisioned for the piece — I used to provide a context of perceived value and something for the less stathead-oriented folks to latch onto before being bombarded with rate stats. Somebody might know Pettitte won 21 games last year, but do they realize his season wasn’t necessarily more productive than Curt Schilling, who won 8? Once we sort those dERA’s,the W/L records end up looking pretty random, and that’s a good thing to show people, I believe.

Another of MGL’s criticisms was the use of only one year of data, a decision I made due to both time constraints (I got hold of the spreadsheet last Friday and wanted to pull something together before the Yankees struck; I won the race by about 15 minutes) and to my lack of facility with larger sets of data. Once you get two seasons of the stuff, you’re either working with databases or doing a ton of sorting by hand, something I don’t have the patience for. Another reason is that in McCracken’s original work, he was comparing two single consecutive seasons, and made no claims which considered multiple years of data together. I’ve simply replicated his methodology because I don’t have any proof beyond one year’s worth of data.

Anyway, MGL’s criticsms were gentle and well-intentioned, so I was quite flattered. Moving along, there are a few more pitchers I wanted to add to the comparison:

• Ted Lilly, who showed signs of blossoming at the end of the season, was traded by Oakland to Toronto a couple of weeks ago.

• Eric Milton, who missed most of 2003 with a knee injury, was traded by Minnesota to Philadelphia earlier this week.

• A.J. Burnett missed most of 2003 after undergoing Tommy John surgery. His injury caused a lot of finger-pointing and precipitated the firing of Florida Marlins manager Jeff Torborg and the hiring of Jack McKeon, so I guess things worked out pretty well in the end. Burnett is on the same accelerated rehab plan that Yankee prospect Brandon Claussen was on, and there’s been speculation that he would be nontendered by the cash-poor but pitching-rich Marlins. Since their trade of Derek Lee, that situation may be resolved, but there’s a good chance he may be wearing another uniform come springtime given the bad blood between him and the Marlins brass.

• Chuck Finley, a free agent last winter, missed all of 2003 for well-publicized personal reasons and an inability to find a contract to his liking. Normally a 41-year-old pitcher who took a season off wouldn’t rate a mention, but Finley’s strikeout rate of 8.2 per 9 IP was second only to Roger Clemens in last year’s free agent class, and that’s the kind of thing that’s worth keeping in mind.

Here are those four pitchers; Lilly’s stats are for ’03, Finley’s for ’02, and the other two guys are blended, with Milton pitching 17 innings in ’03 and Burnett 23:

Player        W   L   IP    ERA    K/9   WHIP  K/W   HR/9   BABIP  dERA

C Finley* 11 15 191 4.15 8.2 1.37 2.2 0.6 .313 3.43
A Burnett 12 11 227 3.44 8.9 1.23 2.1 0.6 .265 3.64
T Lilly* 12 10 178 4.34 7.4 1.33 2.5 1.2 .288 4.22
E Milton* 14 9 188 4.64 6.1 1.16 4.1 1.2 .279 4.41

The arbitration-eligible Burnett, who made $2.5 million last year and at best won’t get a pay cut, would be a financial steal if the Marlins don’t keep him, and because he’s doing his rehab with the Yankees’ secret weapon in Tampa (an outcome of the spat with the Fish heads), they might have an inside track. Lilly is a decent pickup but he’s got lousy mechanics and reported attitude problems, and unless the Blue Jays do something about their defense (they were 25th in Defensive Efficiency, a hair ahead of the Yanks), he may suffer on their turf. It’s tough to know how much to discount Finley’s missed season or even if he’s truly interested; San Diego has been mentioned as a possible destination, and Anaheim, where he made his star, is always a possiblity. At $9 million for an essentially league-average, fragile pitcher, Milton is grossly overvalued, but he may benefit from leaving the turf of the Metrodome. But if the Phils think he’s Kevin Milwood’s equal, fuggedaboutit.

One more name has come up several times, that of Cuban defector Maels Rodriguez, a 24-year old who can reportedly hit triple digits on the radar gun. I don’t know any more about Rodriguez than I’ve read in a few articles, and have very little data on him other than stuff like this:

The righthander’s fastball topped 100 mph when he was 20 years old and he struck out 263 – setting the Cuban league record – three seasons ago.

But last season he pitched only 113 innings, and rumblings of an injury problem cropped up when he was left off Cuba’s Pan Am Games team as well as the Olympic qualifying squad.

Like everybody else, I’ve heard conflicting reports as to whether the injury was legit or a ploy to prevent him from defecting. So I’ll say only this: if he demonstrates that he’s healthy in his audition next month (as the above article mentions), and the triple-digit claims are true or nearly so, the Yanks are sure to be players for him — even with the interest of the 29 other teams. But I doubt George will spring for Contreras money unless they’ve lost Pettitte, closed the door on Colon and seen the Red Sox making eyes at hiim. If that happens, all bets are off.

Remaking the Yankees for 2004, Part I: The Rotation

You can never be too rich or have too much pitching, as the adage goes, and so the New York Yankees entered the 2003 season as they had the previous one, with a surplus of starters and no shortage of controversy surrounding manager Joe Torre’s options. After jerking him around in the second half of 2002, Torre had promised Jeff Weaver a spot in the starting rotation for ’03, but Uncle George’s Christmas gift of a fine Cuban cigar — namely Jose Contreras — complicated that promise, as did the presence of Orlando (El Duque) Hernandez, a less-favored Cuban combustible. Hernandez was traded to Montreal in mid-January for relief help, but with the well-established (to say the least) Roger Clemens, Mike Mussina, Andy Pettitte and David Wells in front of them, Weaver and Contreras seemed destined for a summer pitted more against each other than against opposing hitters.

Weaver started the season in the rotation, pitching like a fifth starter. His ERA elevated into the 5.00+ stratosphere for the final time on May 15, never to descend. He held his spot in the rotation because Contreras got off to an even poorer start in the bullpen; on May 20, five outings into his big-league career, the Cuban’s ERA stood at an appalling 15.63. But two scoreless outings later, Conteras drew a spot start in place of injured David Wells and blanked the Detroit Tigers on two hits over seven innings. He was annointed the fifth starter while Weaver was sent to the bullpen. But after one more impressive outing, Contreras strained his shoulder and needed the Tampa cure.

Weaver returned to the rotation, and it was as if he’d never left. The bombings kept coming, interspersed with the faintest glimmer of competence. When Conteras returned in late August, there was no doubt as to the order of things; it was back to the pen with Weaver and his 5.80 ERA. Conteras pitched well for the final month of the season except for a seven-run drubbing at the hands of the Red Sox in his second outing off of the DL. He drew brief consideration as a postseason starter from Torre, but Joe opted for Wells when push came to shove, just like Joe always opts for “his guys.”

The front four of Mussina, Pettitte, Clemens, and Wells took the Yanks all the way to the World Series, but as December dawns, only the Moose is guaranteed to return wearing pinstripes. Clemens has retired, and Pettitte and Wells are free agents. Pettitte has drawn serious interest from the Houston Astros, who’d like to entice him to pitch closer to his Deer Park, TX home. Wells is preparing to have back surgery so that he can pitch again, either for the Yanks, his hometown San Diego Padres, or some other daring franchise. Contreras and Weaver are still around, and Jon Lieber, a 34-year-old righty who had Tommy John surgery in August 2002, is signed as well. Lieber worked out with the Yanks late last summer, but was never added to the active roster.

Here’s how the 2003 Yankee rotation performed:

Player      W  L    IP    ERA   K/9    WHIP   K/W    HR/9   BABIP  dERA

Clemens 17 9 211.7 3.91 8.08 1.21 3.28 1.02 .291 3.71
Contreras 7 2 71.0 3.30 9.13 1.15 2.40 0.51 .264 3.36
Mussina 17 8 214.7 3.40 8.18 1.08 4.88 0.88 .287 3.18
Pettitte 21 8 208.3 4.02 7.78 1.33 3.60 0.91 .320 3.50
Weaver 7 9 159.3 5.99 5.25 1.62 1.98 0.90 .343 4.31
Wells 15 7 213.0 4.14 4.27 1.23 5.05 1.01 .297 4.15
League AVG 4.53 6.11 1.38 1.93 1.11 .290

The last two columns stand for Batting Average on Balls in Play and Defense Independent Pitching Statistic ERA, two concepts that go hand in hand and which I’ve used before in this context. I went through all of this last year, and will do so again in a large-scale DIPS 2003 rollout later this month, but for now here’s the gist: pitchers have less influence over the outcome of balls in play than we give them credit for, and we can do a better job of evaluating a pitcher’s future performance by concentrating on the defense-independent things he does — strike batters out, walk them, plunk them, and give up homers — than we can by considering the effects of the defense playing behind him in converting batted balls into outs.

Defense Independent Pitching Statistics work from the assumption that since controlling the outcome of balls in play isn’t a replicable skill — one year’s numbers don’t have much correlation with the next year — we can substitute a slightly adjusted league-average peformance in that department. With that in place, we then work from his K, BB, HBP and HR rates to reconstruct the pitcher’s stat line to yield a DIPS ERA (dERA) that actually correlates better with a pitcher’s future ERA than the actual ERA does. It’s complicated, it’s controversial, and no, I didn’t make this stuff up. It’s all out there and it’s been somewhat accepted by the stathead community even as its inventor, Voros McCracken, has taken his work behind the proprietary curtain of the Boston Red Sox and left us with several unanswered questions. That’s a story for another day; if you’re unfamiliar, I suggest you start with the above links to get some background. The formula I’m using here is DIPS 2.0, but I’ve used actual batters faced pitching (BFP) instead of estimating. I’ve also used one-year Park Home Run Factors which I derived via ESPN’s team splits pages. It would probably be less reckless of me to use three-year PHRF’s, but really, it doesn’t make very much difference in this context.

Back to the Yankees, there’s a lot to be taken from the above chart. With the exception of Weaver, this was a very solid collection of starters. Four of them had strikeout rates at least 1.5 per nine innings above the league average. Four had K/W ratios of better than 3 to 1. All of them had homer rates below league average. Keeping the ball out of play, keeping runners off base, and keeping the ball in the park when contact is made are all ways to minimize the damage done by a bad defense. And make no mistake, the Yankee defense was pretty bad. The Yanks as a whole were near the bottom of the majors in (26th out of 30) in Defensive Efficiency. They turned only 69.8 percent of balls in play into outs, compared to the AL average of 71.0. In other words, they yielded a .302 BABIP compared to the league’s .290. On four of the six pitchers above, this shortcoming didn’t have much effect overall; their dERAs are within 0.25 runs of their ERAs. On the other hand, Pettitte and Weaver were particularly poorly supported by the Yankee defense, giving up a high number of hits on balls in play. Their dERAs are considerably lower than their ERAs, by half a run in Pettitte’s case and by over 1.5 runs in Weaver’s case. It’s reasonable to expect some improvement from both.

Now, with Clemens gone, Pettitte and Wells free agents, and Lieber projected to join the rotation, here is what the Yanks are left with (using Lieber’s 2002 stats):

Player      W  L   IP    ERA    K/9    WHIP   K/W    HR/9   BABIP  dERA

Contreras 7 2 71.0 3.30 9.13 1.15 2.40 0.51 .264 3.36
Mussina 17 8 214.7 3.40 8.18 1.08 4.88 0.88 .287 3.18
Weaver 7 9 159.3 5.99 5.25 1.62 1.98 0.90 .343 4.31
Lieber 6 8 141.0 3.70 5.55 1.17 7.25 0.96 .296 3.43

That ain’t gonna cut it, not in an AL East that includes a pesky blood rival with a one-two punch of Pedro Martinez and Curt Schilling. The Yanks know it, so they’re looking to add at least one and probably two front-line starters, with re-signing Pettitte a strong possiblity. In addition to being one short of a standard five-man rotation, the above foursome is all right-handed, and if you’re the New York Yankees, you simply don’t go into the season without at least one southpaw in the mix — another factor in Pettitte’s favor.

I took a look at all of the free agent starters I could pick out from the Transaction Guy‘s list of those who filed. To this I added a smattering of pitchers who are or have been the subject of trade rumors this winter. Some of these guys have already been traded (such as Schilling) or signed (such as Kelvim Escobar), but I’m including them to present a broader picture of the market this winter. They’re sorted by DIPS ERA below, and I’m rounding a few things to keep the chart a bit simpler. Asterisks denote lefties:

Player        W   L   IP    ERA    K/9   WHIP  K/W   HR/9   BABIP  dERA

C Schilling 8 9 168 2.95 10.4 1.05 6.1 0.9 .297 2.69 traded to BOS
K Brown 14 9 211 2.39 7.9 1.14 3.3 0.5 .289 2.93 trade rumors
W Alvarez* 6 2 95 2.37 7.8 1.08 3.6 0.5 .286 3.00
J Vazquez 13 12 231 3.24 9.4 1.11 4.2 1.1 .280 3.10 trade rumors
A Pettitte* 21 8 208 4.02 7.8 1.33 3.6 0.9 .320 3.50
M Batista 10 9 193 3.54 6.6 1.33 2.4 0.6 .307 3.59
K Millwood 14 12 222 4.01 6.9 1.25 2.5 0.8 .285 3.71
R Clemens 17 9 212 3.91 8.1 1.21 3.3 1.0 .291 3.71 retired
K Escobar 13 9 180 4.29 7.9 1.48 2.0 0.7 .325 3.82 signed by ANA
S Ponson 17 12 216 3.75 5.6 1.26 2.2 0.7 .286 3.82
G Rusch* 1 12 123 6.42 6.8 1.75 2.1 0.8 .381 3.95
G Maddux 16 11 218 3.96 5.1 1.18 3.8 1.0 .282 3.98
B Colon 15 13 242 3.87 6.4 1.20 2.6 1.1 .272 4.01
A Ashby 3 10 73 5.18 5.1 1.47 2.4 1.0 .329 4.03
O Perez* 12 12 185 4.52 6.8 1.28 3.1 1.4 .294 4.08 trade rumors
J Thomson 13 14 217 4.85 5.6 1.30 2.8 1.1 .298 4.11
D Wells* 15 7 213 4.14 4.3 1.23 5.1 1.0 .297 4.15
K Rogers* 13 8 195 4.57 5.4 1.42 2.3 1.0 .314 4.30
J Burkett 12 9 182 5.15 5.3 1.37 2.3 1.0 .302 4.38
J Suppan 13 11 204 4.19 4.9 1.31 2.2 1.0 .285 4.40
C Lidle 12 15 193 5.75 5.2 1.43 1.9 1.1 .300 4.46
J D'Amico 9 16 175 4.77 5.1 1.40 2.4 1.2 .305 4.50
S Hitchcock* 6 4 88 4.72 7.0 1.40 2.1 1.4 .287 4.71
D Oliver* 13 11 180 5.04 4.4 1.45 1.4 1.0 .296 4.71
S Reynolds 11 9 167 5.43 5.1 1.49 1.6 1.1 .311 4.73
R Reed 6 12 135 5.07 4.7 1.36 2.4 1.4 .293 4.74
F Garcia 12 14 201 4.52 6.4 1.33 2.0 1.4 .273 4.79 trade rumors
J Lima 8 3 73 4.91 3.9 1.45 1.2 0.9 .291 4.84
B Anderson* 14 11 198 3.78 4.0 1.29 2.0 1.2 .280 4.95 signed by KC
P Hentgen 7 8 161 4.09 5.6 1.29 1.7 1.4 .256 5.05 signed by TOR
S Estes 8 11 152 5.73 6.1 1.74 1.2 1.2 .329 5.15
B Tomko 13 9 203 5.28 5.1 1.52 2.0 1.6 .314 5.21
J Halama* 3 5 109 4.22 4.2 1.41 1.4 1.5 .263 5.31 signed by TAM
R Helling 8 8 155 5.17 5.7 1.37 2.2 1.8 .284 5.43
P Abbott 1 2 48 5.29 6.0 1.53 1.2 1.5 .267 5.53 signed by TAM
I Valdes 8 8 115 6.10 3.7 1.54 1.6 1.8 .307 5.60
J Haynes 2 12 94 6.30 4.7 1.86 0.9 1.3 .320 5.61
G Stephenson 7 13 174 4.59 4.7 1.30 1.5 1.5 .248 5.71
K Appier 8 9 112 5.40 4.4 1.46 1.3 1.7 .266 5.93 signed by KC
P Astacio 3 2 37 7.36 4.9 1.77 1.1 2.0 .312 6.44
Average 10 10 164 4.45 6.0 1.35 2.3 1.1 .295 4.33

Brian Cashman must have the same spreadsheet I do. The starters the Yanks have explored via trades — Schilling, Javier Vazquez, and now Kevin Brown — are right at the top of this list, better than the free-agent pickings. And for good reason — they’re superstars, or in Vazquez’s case, should be (look at that strikeout rate and the K/W).

Cashman’s reasoning is sound. This is not, as a whole, a very impressive group. Their ERA is a hair above the major-league average of 4.40, their strikeout rate a hair below. They’ve got considerably better control, however, with a 2.3 K/W rate compared to the majors’ average of 1.9. But once you skim the cream off the top, you’re not left with much. Conisder that only 14 of the 40 pitchers here had K rates above the major league average of 6.4 per 9 innings, and one of them is retired. Of the top five in K rate, three of them are Schilling, Brown, and Vazquez, guys on the trading block, and a fourth is Clemens. So only 10 out of the 36 available free agents had above-average K rates. More than any other stat, this says that this is a pretty thin market, full of Granny Gooden types and Grade F meat (mostly circus animals, some filler) and thus beneath the Yanks’ radar. Notice how several of the guys at the higher end of the dERA projections are already signed — guys like Brian Anderson, John Halama and Pat Hentgen, whose luck on balls in play disguised some of their crapitude. These guys knew that any deal they came across was a good one, and they took the bait. Twelve of these pitchers have rates below 5.0; if you can’t strike out five guys per nine innings, you’re living on borrowed time.

There’s a shortage of credible lefties for the Yanks to consider after Pettitte. You’ve got the fragile Wilson Alvarez, the been-there-done-that Wells, Sterling Hitchcock, and Kenny Rogers, and cannon fodder such as Glendon Rusch and Darren Oliver to go with a couple of already-signed guys. The only semi-viable alternative the Yankees have to Dandy Andy — who looks especially worth the money in this context — is via a trade for somebody such as the Dodgers’ Odalis Perez, who is on the block. Unless the Yanks go far beyond this list, they’ll not only sign Pettitte, they’ll almost certainly work a deal to bring Wells to camp to see if he’s got anything left after back surgery.

Another guy near the top of the list is Miguel “Shitty Poet” Batista, who the Yanks have considered as a Ramiro Mendoza-like swingman. But with their recent and pending bullpen signings (Tom Gordon, Paul Quantrill, Felix Heredia, and Gabe White), this may no longer be an option, and with the D-Backs having traded Schilling, re-signing Batista may be a higher priority for them than before.

So who’s left for the Yankees to consider? A lot of it depends on whether you believe whatever’s coming out of agent Scott Boras crack-hole. The Phils have offered Kevin Millwood a three year deal worth $9 or $10 million per year, but Boras says that he’s seeking 5-7 years at $13 million per. Put down the freebase pipe, Scott.

Brown, another Boras client, is said to be willing to waive his no-trade clause to come to the Yanks, but the Dodgers are giving mixed signals as to whether they’re really interested. Brown is owed $30 million over the next two years, and the Dodgers are relatively deep in pitching but have an offense that looks as though it was cobbled together from the survivors of a shipwreck. With $30 million, they could make some serious headway to add a hitter like Nomar Garciaparra, Pudge Rodriguez, or even Alex Rodriguez… okay, that’s the Dodger fan in me daydreaming. Back to reality… a deal centering around Brown and Jeff Weaver has been discussed, but so has including either Alfonso Soriano and Nick Johnson. A Brown-for-Weaver-and-prospects swap is a no-brainer even given the surly starter’s notoriously fragile makeup, but if the Yanks need to dig any deeper than that, they would do better to consider Vazquez if they’re determined to go the trade route. Whether they should consider trading Sori or Nick the Stick is a whole ‘nother story I’ll get into when I cover the Yankee offense. As for the deal in question, at least one report says it’s a dead issue.

Once upon a 1992, Greg Maddux (another Boras client) was a great idea for the Yankees. And up until his last couple of years, he would have still been a good idea for the Yanks. But his time as a premium pitcher appears to have passed; he’ll be 38 in April, his ERA was a run higher than his career mark, his strikeout rate was in the low 5’s for the second consecutive year, and he doesn’t go very deep into ballgames. He’s not a Clemens or Schilling-like power pitcher, but he’s going to be looking for something at least in the ballpark of $14 million he made this year, especially with Boras calling the shots. Pass.

The 31-year-old Bartolo Colon has intrigued the Yanks for quite awhile; I wrote about him several times last winter. Depending upon which measure you use, according to the Bill James Handbook 2004, he is either the fastest or second-fastest pitcher in the AL, with an average fastball of 93.4 (second to C.C. Sabathia’s 93.9), the most pitches above 100 MPH, and the most above 95. That said, he doesn’t strike all that many batters out anymore:

Year   IP   K     K/9

1998 204 158 6.97
1999 205 161 7.07
2000 188 212 10.15
2001 222 201 8.15
2002 233 149 5.75
2003 242 173 6.43
car 1389 1120 7.26

His drop in strikeouts has been attributed to a conscious change in pitching style designed to preserve his arm, and there may be something to this. Here’s his K rate alongside the number of pitches per batter:

Year    K/9  #P/PA

1998 6.97 3.72
1999 7.07 4.05
2000 10.15 4.01
2001 8.15 3.85
2002 5.75 3.66
2003 6.43 3.59
car 7.26 3.82

Conscious or not, the relationship is clear — he’s cut back on his pitches. Comparing 2003 and 2001, he made 34 starts in each season, but threw 20 more innings in ’03 despite throwing ony 37 more pitches, and his ERA was 0.19 lower. And while Colon’s conditioning habits concern the Yanks — the buoyant 240-pounder doesn’t seem to be cutting back on his fruit pies — he gets a relatively clean bill of health, with no history of arm trouble, but occasional “cranky back” woes. He’s a horse capable of gobbling 230 innings a year, and a good enough pitcher that the Yanks should consider signing him.

Sidney Ponson is another beefy boy who, on the surface, the Yanks might consider as a cheaper alternative. The Aruban knight is 27, doesn’t have a great K rate or great control, but he’s coming off a career high 17 wins, and is a free agent for the first time. On the other hand, this guy has miles on his arm, and I mean miles. He was throwing 200+ innings and complete games as a 22- and 23-year-old. Baseball Prospectus injury expert Will Carroll was unequivocal regarding Ponson; he red-lighted him in his Orioles Team Health Report this spring, and wrote the following:

The words “torn labrum” are beginning to be the most dreaded in pitching. The diagnosis is a sure ticket to a red light. Few players – if any – come back fully from the injury and the medical treatment is so hit and miss that nearly half the players that have one procedure are forced to have a repeat procedure before returning to the game. Sidney Ponson tore his labrum at some point in 2000 when he was worked mercilessly in his age-23 season. Looking back at the stats, one can almost see the drop-off happen. It’s a wonder he’s been able to remain effective with such an injury–it’s another data point in the argument for non-surgical treatment of labrum injuries. It’s my educated guess that Ponson is limited to about 80% of his potential value due to the injury. If that’s not enough, Ponson dealt with bicipital tendonitis for nearly half the [2002] season. It’s less likely now than two years ago that Ponson will break out, and more likely that he will break down. In another case of what might have been if sports medicine was more science than art, Ponson should be one of the main exhibits.

Despite the 216 innings Ponson racked up this season, Ponson is a disaster waiting to happen. Is it any wonder Baltimore is interested in re-signing him?

Perez showed flashes of brilliance for the Dodgers in 2002, with a 15-10 record and a 3.00 ERA in 222 innings. But that performance was aided by a .247 BABIP, and so when he returned to earth in that category, his numbers declined. Gopher problems didn’t help; his home run rate increased by 60 percent. He’s still young, 27 next June, he strikes people out, and he’s got decent control. As a lefty, he could be a decent fit for Yankee Stadium, where he’d get more protection against the longball. Even so, he’s a groundball pitcher, and the Yankee defense won’t do him many favors. But if the pinstriped pursuit of Pettitte goes pfffft, or if the team can pry him from the Dodgers without surrendering Sori or the Stick, he’s worth a shot.

Alvarez would be a daring move. He’ll be 34 and coming off of a fluky-looking four months of light usage in Dodger Stadium. He’d always been a failry laborious pitcher, one whose lack of control (career 1.6 K/W) costs him a lot of innings and energy. I didn’t see him at all last year, so I don’t know what changed for him other than being healthy. It worked, but I’m not sure I’d pay to see if it works again outside of Chavez Ravine.

Pettitte put together the best stretch of his career with a 16-2, 3.29 ERA run after June 8, and capped it off with a 3-1, 2.10 ERA postseason in which he looked every bit the icewater-peeing ace of a championship caliber ballclub. He’s gone from being a straight-up Tommy John-family lefty to being a hybrid of a TJ and a power pitcher, and his control has gotten better in the process. He’s had elbow problems here and there, and Will Carroll said he worries that every pitch he sees Pettitte throw might be his last (silly Will) but he’s always been able to avert surgery through rest and rededication to proper mechanics. The longer the Yankees hold onto him, the greater the chance that someday he’ll be rehabbing on their watch (what was that about Tommy John?), but given the way the Yanks throw dollars around, signing him after the season he had should be a no-brainer. And speaking as a Yankee fan, come hell or high water, I’d rather Pettitte were in pinstripes.

Wells is a different beast. He gets by on pinpoint control and a sheer devil-may-care willingness to throw strikes and let hitters do their worst, and when his back is right, that’s more than enough. But his bad back crapped out at precisely the wrong time, doing as much to cost the Yanks a championship as Joe Torre’s mismanagement in Game Four. He’ll be 41 and coming off of his second back surgery in three years, and he may not even be ready for spring training. If the Yanks can come up with another lefty option that doesn’t break the bank or wreak havoc on the roster, they should take it and let Wells finish his career elsewhere. Push comes to shove, he’ll be available at the trading deadline for a warm body or two.

Beyond that, we’ve got the Thomsons, Burketts, D’Amicos and Suppans of the world, anonymous Johns and Jeffs who would look great in the middle of somebody else’s rotation. The Yanks won’t have to go this low unless the bottom falls out by June, so I’ll spare the analysis for now.

Roughly in order, here’s how I’d rate these guys in terms of their priority for the Yanks. Expect them to pick two:

1. Pettitte: losing him creates not one but two problems in that they’re without a lefty starter.

2. Colon: a solid choice who just might flourish with more stability, and all he costs is money.

3. Brown: if getting rid of Weaver is an option in a deal, the Yanks should be on it like white on rice.

4. Vasquez: the price in trade may be too high, but this is a heck of a pitcher.

5. Perez: young and intriguing, he could really benefit from Yankee Stadium.

6. Maddux: a stretch given the Yankees other needs and weaknesses.

7. Wells: not much reason to push their luck further.

8. Alvarez: might be worth a sniff, but don’t expect much.

Though many of the Yanks deals regarding relievers are done, I’ll take a look at the overall relief market in the coming days.

• • •

Postscript: By now the news is everywhere that the Yanks acquired Javier Vazquez for a package consisting of first baseman Nick Johnson, outfielder Juan Rivera, and reliever Randy Choate. I’ll have more to say on the deal tomorrow, but for those of you who have read this far, I’ll give you my quick take.

Like most Yankee fans, I have mixed emotions about this deal. I hate to see them trade Johnson, who is already a heck of a hitter and who may well get even better. But if they’re going to trade him, sending him to the NL is better than trading him to a team where he can bite them on the ass 10-19 times a year, and Lord knows the Expos could use a break. Also not to like: as Clifford’s Big Red Blog points out, with this deal the Yanks are tapped for young, major league-ready prospects (unless you think highly of Erick Almonte and Jorge De Paula, in which case I’ve got some oceanfront property in Utah to sell you). With their rapidly aging lineup, any breakdown next summer leaves them pretty screwed if they need to upgrade.

But say this for the Yanks: they’re getting the best pitcher on the market, a guy who’s better than any of the free agents available, and who’s still pretty young at 27. High K rate (9.4 per 9 IP), excellent control (4.2 K/W ratio), not ground-ball dependent, not gopher-happy. Except for the lack of postseason/pennant race experience, you couldn’t engineer a better fit for the Yanks right now.

About the only concern is the mileage on his arm. As readers pointed out in one of the Baseball Primer thread, Vaz was second only to Kerry Wood in Pitcher Abuse Points this season. And if he breaks down in 2004, this deal is going to look awful from the Yankee standpoint. But there are no guarantees with any pitcher. As Will Carroll said in a recent interview on Rich’s Baseball Beat, “Pitching is almost literally a coinflip proposition, injury-wise. Just over half of all pitchers will be on the DL at some point in a three-year period and some of those will be serious–elbow reconstruction, torn labrum.” Since this deal wasn’t contingent on Vazquez signing an extension, at least if he breaks down in ’04 the Yanks will save themselves from throwing another $40 million down the hole. And there’s plenty of doubt about Johnson’s ability to stay healthy over a 162-game season. The great philosopher Joaquin Andujar said it best: “Youneverknow.”

It’s Only Money

I’m working on the first of my Remaking the Yankees articles, which will be up either today or tomorrow. Right now I just wanted to update the Yanks’ contract page in the wake of their signings of Aaron Boone, reliever Tom Gordon and futility infielder Enrique Wilson. I don’t have the exact breakdown of the 2-year, $7.25 million Gordon deal, so I’m going to assume it’s $3.5 and $3.75 mil for now. I also forgot to include reliever Chris Hammond and minor leaguers Drew Henson and Adrian Hernandez in my previous list.

According to various papers around the country (or if you believe everything you read), deals are pending for outfielder Gary Sheffield (3 years/$36-38 mil) and relievers Paul Quantrill (2 years/$6 mil), Felix Heredia (2 years/$3.5 mil), and Gabe White (2 years/$4.8 mil). Yes, that’s three lefties. Chris Hammond, please pick up the white paging phone…

So here we go again, with figures via the essential MLB Contracts Page. These numbers have been calculated to include prorated signing bonuses; year-by-year team totals include buyouts but not team options:

2004: Jeter $18, Mussina $14, Williams $12, Giambi $10, Posada $9, Contreras $9, Rivera $8.89, Matsui $7, Weaver $6.25, Boone $5.75, Karsay $5, Gordon $3.5, Lieber $2.45, Hammond $2.4, Henson $2.2, A. Hernandez 1.0, Wilson 0.7. Total: $117.14 million

2005: Jeter $19, Mussina $17, Williams $12, Posada $12, Giambi $11, Weaver $9.25, Contreras $8, Matsui $8, Lieber $8 team option/$0.25 buyout, Karsay $5. Henson $3.8, Gordon $3.75, Hammond $3.0/0.2.Total: $109.25 million

2006: Jeter $20, Giambi $18, Mussina $17, Williams $15/$3.5, Posada $13.5, Contreras $9, Karsay $6.5/$1.25. Henson $6.0. Total: $88.25 million

2007: Jeter $21, Giambi $21, Mussina $17/$1.5, Posada $12/$4. Total: $47.5 million

2008: Jeter $21, Giambi $21. Total: $42 million

2009: Jeter $21, Giambi $22/$5. Total: 26 million

Notes from a Lefty

A belated Happy Thanksgiving to everybody; I hope your Turkey Day was as good as mine. Andra and I hosted Thanksgiving dinner in our small East Village apartment, with her mother visiting us from Milwaukee and my brother and his girlfriend joining us as well. Andra did a superb job on the bird and all the trimmings, my bro chose well with the wine, and we’ve got a fridge full of leftovers. Yet another reason to be thankful.

Progress with my surgically repaired right shoulder has been slow. I’m still wearing a sling 97% of the time, taking it off only for showers and clothing changes. This means most of my typing is being done left- (and one-) handed. Not only has this slowed the speed with which I can record my thoughts in writing, it’s apparently slowed the formation of those thoughts. I feel like I’m pedaling a bicycle with one leg, hence the scarcity of work being done for this space.

I am making forward progress on something, however. My hunt-and-peck style is suitable for manipulating a spreadsheet, so I have begun culling the data necessary to create Defense Independent Pitching Statistics (DIPS) for 2003. It will be awhile before I can present full data here, but my hope is to have at least some of it to offer for my upcoming analysis of the Yankees’ options for starting pitchers.

So while you’re waiting for my arm to grow back, check out what Alex Belth has to say about the Curt Schilling deal, read Rich Lederer‘s fascinating interview with Will Carroll, start arguing at Baseball Primer or on your local barstool over which of these men should be elected to the Hall of Fame, or check out some of the other usual suspects listed at left.